<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ECTI Blog &#187; Commerce Dept</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/category/topics/commerce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:11:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Commerce/BIS &#8220;Best Practices for Industry to Guard Against Unlawful Diversion”</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/10/05/commercebis-best-practices-for-industry-to-guard-against-unlawful-diversion%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/10/05/commercebis-best-practices-for-industry-to-guard-against-unlawful-diversion%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Holly Thorne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlawful diversion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=1347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) recently published a new set of &#8220;best practices&#8221; to help secure trade through transshipment hubs, or to any intermediate country before being shipped to the country of ultimate destination. Transshipment has logistical benefits, but also can be used illegally to disguise the actual country of ultimate destination. BIS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) recently published a new set of &#8220;best practices&#8221; to help secure trade through transshipment hubs, or to any intermediate country before being shipped to the country of ultimate destination. Transshipment has logistical benefits, but also can be used illegally to disguise the actual country of ultimate destination.</p>
<p>BIS is encouraging industry to use the following best practices to avoid unlawful diversion:</p>
<ul>
<li>Pay heightened attention to BIS&#8217;s Red Flag Indicators and communicate red flag concerns internally.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Seek to utilize only those trade facilitators and freight forwarders that administer sound export control management and compliance programs that include transshipment trade best practices.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Obtain detailed information on the credentials of foreign customers to assess diversion risk.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>For routed transactions, establish and maintain a trusted relationship with parties to mitigate risks.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Communicate export control classification and destination information to end-users and consignees on government and commercial export documentation.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Provide the ECCN or the EAR99 classification to freight forwarders for all export transactions and report the classifications in the Automated Export System (AES), if applicable.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Use information technology to the maximum extent feasible to augment &#8220;know your customer&#8221; and other due-diligence measures in combating the threats of diversion and increase confidence that shipments will reach authorized end-users for authorized end-uses.</li>
</ul>
<p>The full list of Best Practices can be found <a href="http://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforcement/bestpractices.htm">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/10/05/commercebis-best-practices-for-industry-to-guard-against-unlawful-diversion%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Available Customer Service/Export Compliance Position</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/07/05/available-customer-serviceexport-compliance-position/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/07/05/available-customer-serviceexport-compliance-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle McClellan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Trade Controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export License]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs/Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OFAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=1159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basic Purpose Responsible for the administration of customer service issues, customer communications and customer requests and orders on a daily basis. Maintain and ensure integrity of all customer data in the business systems, including customer property, orders and associated dollars.  Assure that all customer requests for quotes are properly managed in the PTS system. Responsible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="756" valign="top"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Basic   Purpose</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Responsible for the   administration of customer service issues, customer communications and   customer requests and orders on a daily basis. Maintain and ensure integrity   of all customer data in the business systems, including customer property,   orders and associated dollars.  Assure that all customer requests for   quotes are properly managed in the PTS system. Responsible for maintaining   and ensuring accurate backlog, orders, and market segmentation data. </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="756" valign="top"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Position Specification</span></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="414" valign="top"><strong>Education/Experience</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>An   Associates or Bachelors degree with a minimum of 5 years related industry   work experience.</li>
<li>Solid   understanding of military and commercial export compliance regulations.</li>
<li>Demonstrated   ability to effectively and professionally communicate with all levels in the organization,   vendors and customers.</li>
<li>Understanding   of pricing models.</li>
<li>Proven   negotiation skills.</li>
<li>Strong   verbal and written communication skills.</li>
<li>Strong   computer skills with working knowledge of MS Office and Access.</li>
<li>Proven   team-work capabilities and experience.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td width="342" valign="top"><strong>Additional   Requirements</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Understanding   of the Fourth Shift or Syteline ERP system.</li>
<li>Able   to handle and resolve customer complaints and problems and escalate when   required.</li>
<li>Willing   and able to develop long-term relationships internally and externally.</li>
<li>Attention   to detail.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="756" valign="top"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Functional Scope</span></strong></p>
<p>The   Customer Service Representative provides support to both the internal and   external customers of the company.  This position plays an active role   in the maintenance and management of the various business systems. Success in   this role will require a proactive approach and the ability to create and   implement process improvements to ensure that the systems and processes are   as robust as possible to provide superior service to the customers.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="756" valign="top"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Duties and   Responsibilities</span></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Responsible for the accurate and timely management of        all sales order activity.</li>
<li>Ensure all sales data is accurate and complete in        order to maintain order, market and backlog reporting integrity        including schedule and associated dollars.</li>
<li>Responsible for raising export compliance concerns to        the DECA or DECA backup when required.</li>
<li>Serves as a central point of contact for customer        inquiries. Provides customers with updated order and delivery status.</li>
<li>Responsible for inputting data (RFQs, pricing,        status, etc) into the PTS (Proposal Tracking System) and ensuring that        all data is accurate and complete and up to date.</li>
<li>Provides engineering with request for quote        information required to initiate estimating process.</li>
<li>Performs contract review and order acceptance        process. Controls and maintains master contracts/ purchase order files.</li>
<li>Assists with the configuration control process.</li>
<li>Performs the EDI transaction conversion to the        business system. Tracks changes in delivery dates, prices and handles        terminations.</li>
<li>Maintains customer information in the various        business systems.</li>
<li>Responsible for disseminating Terms and Conditions,        special shipping instructions, configuration changes and quality        requirements throughout the organization.</li>
<li>Assists accounting with invoicing and collection        issues.</li>
<li>Review Customer Scorecards.</li>
<li>Perform other duties as required by the business and        as instructed by supervisor.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong> </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="756" valign="top"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Essential Functions of   Position</span></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Interpersonal   Skills</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Must be able to communicate clearly and effectively with   all levels of personnel within the organization and the customer.</li>
<li>Must be able to communicate orally and/or in writing as to   work requirements, work in progress, and/or work completion</li>
<li>Must be able to follow complex instructions and/or   directions. May require ability to decide on a course/sequence of action</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Schedule   and Planning</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Must be able to schedule and organize time effectively to   satisfactorily complete assigned tasks and functions.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Physical   Effort</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Minimal physical effort</li>
<li>May be required to travel occasionally to customer   premises or corporate office.</li>
<li>Operate personal computer.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Working   Conditions</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Primarily work in office areas with exposure to shop        floor.</li>
<li>Generally responsible for the safety and clean up of        own work area.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Disclaimer</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The above information on this job description has        been designed to indicate the general nature and level of work performed        by employees within this classification. It is not designed to contain        or be interpreted as a comprehensive inventory of all duties,        responsibility and qualification required of employees assigned to this        job.</li>
</ul>
<p>Contact Pamela R. Daly regarding this position at:</p>
<p>Barnes Aerospace</p>
<p>169 Kennedy Rd</p>
<p>Windsor, CT 06095</p>
<p>P: 860-687-5270</p>
<p>F: 401-228-0823</p>
<p><a href="mailto:pdaly@barnesaero.com">pdaly@barnesaero.com</a></p>
<p><strong> </strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/07/05/available-customer-serviceexport-compliance-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Export Compliance Training?  Important?  You betcha!</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/04/04/export-compliance-training-important-you-betcha/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/04/04/export-compliance-training-important-you-betcha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Black</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Trade Controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denied & Restricted Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OFAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Dept]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=1029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The risks of fines of hundreds of thousands &#8212; or even millions &#8212; of dollars for violations make export compliance important.  The complicated, arcane, and voluminous regulations that impose incredible burdens on your day-to-day business activities make export compliance difficult.  A thorough and effective multi-level company training program makes a reasonable level of export compliance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The risks of fines of hundreds of thousands &#8212; or even millions &#8212; of dollars for violations make export compliance important.  The complicated, arcane, and voluminous regulations that impose incredible burdens on your day-to-day business activities make export compliance difficult.  A thorough and effective multi-level company training program makes a reasonable level of export compliance achievable.</p>
<p>A company needs three levels of training<span id="more-1029"></span></p>
<p>1)      <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Expert training:</span> The core export compliance experts need to be experts on the rules</p>
<p>2)      <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Awareness training</span>:  A wide range of company personnel need to trained to know what issues export rules create and how to handle them or whom to ask for help</p>
<p>3)      <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Executive training</span>:  Top level management needs to understand the risks of violation and how export rules impact the company’s business activities so management can decide how much money and resources to spend on compliance.</p>
<p>This article will focus on expert training.  I will write articles later to discuss the other training.</p>
<p>A starting point for any company export compliance program is for the company to figure out what the rules are and how they apply they apply to the company’s products, technologies and activities.  This usually means that the company, depending on its size and export issues, appoints one or two, or maybe a few people to be the export compliance experts.  While someone new to export compliance theoretically could learn the rules by reading the rules, it is usually much better for the newbie to be taught what the rules say and how they work before digging into the voluminous, arcane, and complicated regulations.  There are various export control regulations—the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), the Foreign Trade Regulations (FTR), plus the various Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) regulations—and the company needs to know if and how each of these regulations impacts the company.</p>
<p>And, unfortunately, a quick glance is not enough and common sense won’t help—who would think the ITAR regulates exports of items involved in sending TV signals for the Sunday football game to your house?  You need to learn what the rules actually say.  Beware of company folk lore—“we’ve always done it this way,” or “if we sell to the military its ITAR, but if we sell to somebody else it is not ITAR,” or “the ITAR does not let you put technical data in the ‘public domain.’”  You need to focus on learning the rules themselves.</p>
<p>Beware of oral information that contradicts the rules—whether from a government or other source.  Sure, maybe today the government interprets the word “green” to include “yellow” because yellow is a precursor to green.  But if the rules do not say that, and you act as if green does not include yellow, you have put yourself in a defendable position, to say the least.  Most of us do not talk to every government official in Washington so that we know the interpretation of the day &#8212; and we don’t know if 99% or only 0.01% of the government interprets green to include yellow.  Learn how to read the rules &#8212; then do what they say!</p>
<p>Once you start on the long path to becoming an expert on the rules, you have to figure out what procedures you will implement to help your company follow the rules.  Technically, in most cases, implementing procedures is optional because it is not a violation to fail to have compliance procedures.  It certainly is prudent, however, to implement compliance procedures if you want to do a good job on compliance.</p>
<p>Going to a live seminar is the best form of training.  There is nothing better than being able to interrupt a knowledgeable speaker and ask a question when it pops into your head.  A key part of live training may be the 5 minutes you spend at a break talking to the instructor about a specific issue.  Electronic or online training is better than nothing if your company is not willing to pay for live training, or if live training is otherwise not an option.</p>
<p>In any event, you need to make sure the people giving the training are experts on the rules.  They need to be able to give practical advice on the many different approaches you can take in implementing company procedures to follow the rules.  Verify the expertise of the trainers.  A person’s title or pay grade is not a key factor, nor is whether the person works in or outside of the government.  The best thing to do is talk to industry experts who actually have received training from the person giving the training you are considering.</p>
<p>Your goal should be to become an expert on the rules, or perhaps an expert on the rules that specifically impact your company.  This is a difficult task but you can do it.  (If I can do it, anybody can, trust me.)  To be an expert, you need regular and repeated training.  The first training you get to introduce you to the topic may be overwhelming, so just try to pick the most important issues—for example, take away the fact that you need to do export jurisdiction determinations and classifications for all of your hardware, technical data and software, but don’t worry if you didn’t memorize the second exception to the first prohibition in the antiboycott regulations.</p>
<p>Go to each training after the first with two objectives.  First, to hear people validate that what you think is true is true.  These export rules are often illogical and hard to believe so you might start doubting your understanding.  You will get value from just listening to somebody say that a convoluted rule means what you think it means.  You second objective is to learn more.  Eventually you need to understand the second exception to the first prohibition in the antiboycott regulations.  I know people who are experts and continue to attend the same seminar 5 – 10 times because they always get something new out of it.</p>
<p>If you are an export compliance professional, you need to embrace this reality:  The more you learn about the export compliance rules, the more difficult it becomes to comply with the rules.  Think about it:  A novice thinks export controls just mean taking care of exports of products.  As that person learns more he realizes that export compliance applies to hundreds of emails leaving his facility daily, and then that his employees with work visas present export compliance issues.  More and more training will not make your life easier, but will likely just add more things to your list of things do to as you learn about a rule you did not know about, or as you notice a different aspect of a rule.</p>
<p>As you can see, training is not a onetime event.  You should be training at least once a year, and I recommend twice a year in most cases.  I already discussed how the complexity of the rules calls for repeated training.  These rules also change.  The government procedures often change (hmm, the ITAR Agreement Guidelines come to mind!).  You need to stay up to date with changes and continue to grow and build your expertise.</p>
<p>Having well trained export compliance experts is good for your company.  Being a well-trained export compliance expert is good for you.  As your expertise grows, so does your confidence in your knowledge, and that puts you in a better position to tell your engineer “yes, it is true that we have to treat the employee with a work visa as an export issue.”  You will encounter people who want to comply with what the rules ought to say or what they would like for them to say.  You argue against those people by showing them what the rules say.  Your expertise will enable you to point to the rules as the basis for the positions you take so you can say “maybe it does not make sense, but this is what it says.”</p>
<p>And, of course, being well trained on export compliance is a valuable addition to your resume!</p>
<p>***************************************</p>
<p><a href="http://learnexportcompliance.com/johnblack">John Black</a> has been in the field of export controls since 1984, is a consultant with BSG Consulting and a regular speaker for The Export Compliance Training Institute (ECTI).  ECTI offers live seminars for US Companies and companies located overseas.  The current schedule of their seminars can be found at <a href="http://learnexportcompliance.com/schedule">http://learnexportcompliance.com/schedule</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/04/04/export-compliance-training-important-you-betcha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equal Opportunity</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/equal-opportunity/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/equal-opportunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle McClellan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Trade Controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs/Careers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Leeds, Esq. has been named President of the “Women in International Trade-Los Angeles” for 2011.  Now you may be asking if this is a typo or some sort of oxymoron, well it’s not. The organization actually represents both men and women, but I have to wonder why they don’t just call themselves the “Men [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Leeds, Esq. has been named President of the “Women in International Trade-Los Angeles” for 2011.  Now you may be asking if this is a typo or some sort of oxymoron, well it’s not. The organization actually represents both men and women, but I have to wonder why they don’t just call themselves the “Men and Women in International Trade.”</p>
<p>Bruce says: “Although it may seem unusual that a male will be President of WIT-LA, it emphasized the point that the organization represents all the people involved in export-import trade and regulations. I look forward to working with a very talented board of directors of both genders and many different backgrounds, to create valuable programs that serve the trade community.”</p>
<p>Website: <a href="http://www.wit-la.org/index.asp">http://www.wit-la.org/index.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/equal-opportunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Certification Requirement in Immigration I-129 Form Begins February 20, 2011</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/new-certification-requirement-in-immigration-i-129-form-begins-february-20-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/new-certification-requirement-in-immigration-i-129-form-begins-february-20-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Black</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deemed Export]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export License]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs/Careers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Dept]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=1008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As many of you know a new Form I-129 requirement forces companies requesting a work visa to certify that they do not have any technology that requires an export license for the potential employee, or that they either have an export license or procedures to prevent access to export license-required technology. It is funny how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As many of you know a new Form I-129 requirement forces companies requesting a work visa to certify that they do not have any technology that requires an export license for the potential employee, or that they either have an export license or procedures to prevent access to export license-required technology.<span id="more-1008"></span></p>
<p>It is funny how many companies are getting so excited about the requirement to certify this.  The EAR and ITAR export licensing requirements have been in place forever.  If this certification requirement creates a problem for a company, I might guess that a company was not complying with the EAR and ITAR requirements related to releasing controlled technology to foreign national employees.  But, of course, it’s only a guess.  But, I would advise companies to be careful about complaining loudly about this certification requirement unless they know they have been doing a good job complying with the EAR and ITAR for their foreign national employees.</p>
<p>The temporarily good news is that the US Government announced that employers are not required to fill out Section 6 of the form (“Certification Regarding the Release of Controlled Technology or Technical Data to Foreign Persons in the United States”) until February 20, 2011.</p>
<p>Additional information available at: <a href="http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextiod=ef1ee46afc5fc210VgnVCM10000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=e7801c2c9be44210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD">http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextiod=ef1ee46afc5fc210VgnVCM10000082ca60aRCRD&amp;vgnextchannel=e7801c2c9be44210VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/new-certification-requirement-in-immigration-i-129-form-begins-february-20-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BIS Announces New Validate End-User (VEU)</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/bis-announces-new-validate-end-user-veu/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/bis-announces-new-validate-end-user-veu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle McClellan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export License]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=1001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Effective January 18, 2011 BIS added CSMC Technologies Corporation to the validated end-users program in the People’s Republic of China. In a nutshell the program allows certain items to be exported, reexported, or transferred (in-country) to approved companies and in this case 3 CSMC facilities. BIS has also revised the validated end-user authorization for Advanced [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Effective January 18, 2011 BIS added CSMC Technologies Corporation to the validated end-users program in the People’s Republic of China. In a nutshell the program allows certain items to be exported, reexported, or transferred (in-country) to approved companies and in this case 3 CSMC facilities.</p>
<p>BIS has also revised the validated end-user authorization for Advanced Micro Devices China, Inc. by updating the list of the company’s approved buildings and the descriptions of items that are eligible for export, reexport, or in-country transfer to AMD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/bis-announces-new-validate-end-user-veu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t Do This:  PPG’s License Application Denied and It Went Ahead Anyway</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/don%e2%80%99t-do-this-ppg%e2%80%99s-license-application-denied-and-it-went-ahead-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/don%e2%80%99t-do-this-ppg%e2%80%99s-license-application-denied-and-it-went-ahead-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Black</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export License]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violations & Fines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was I dreaming when I read various export control pundits talking about the significance of the PPG enforcement case (reported above) because the US went after a company in China or because there was this indirect issue or that indirect issue?  Sorry, this is not new.  The new importance and &#8220;sweeping significance&#8221; of this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was I dreaming when I read various export control pundits talking about the significance of the PPG enforcement case (reported above) because the US went after a company in China or because there was this indirect issue or that indirect issue?  Sorry, this is not new.  The new importance and &#8220;sweeping significance&#8221; of this is way over-rated.  It appears some experts are attempting to distort the importance to make it a broader, scary issue.  The issue is they got a license denied and shipped anyway.  That has always been at the top of my personal list of violations not to commit.</p>
<p>Shipping after a license is denied is willful and knowing and intentional and criminal, and, by the way, stupid.  Not only did they know a license was required, they knew the USG would deny the license.  People could have gone to jail and companies could have been added to the denial list.   Not a mistake or accident here but intentionally violating the regulations.  Add that to nuclear facility, entity list, China and Pakistan, and you have a big ole stew of aggravating factors</p>
<p>Perhaps I should apologize for saying the violation was stupid.  My mother always says it is rude to say “stupid.”  OK, the violation demonstrates a lack of sound judgment and thought and illustrated behavior based greed.  I just assumed that everybody knows that if BIS denies your license application, there is a good chance BIS will watch your company closely because BIS suspects your company will ship anyway.  You know why BIS does that?  Because idiotic (my mother doesn’t read this stuff) companies ship anyway when their license is denied.<span id="more-997"></span></p>
<p>I have seen some people say this case is a new issue because it shows that if you export to somebody related to somebody on the list, you get in big trouble.  That is not what this case proves.  But it sure makes good hype for lawyers and consultants trying to scare up some work by saying it is not enough to screen the parties actually involved in the transaction because you have to find out all of the parties possibility related to the parties in the transaction and screen them too.</p>
<p>But, honestly, this case should scare only companies who decide to export after they get their license denied—and that is nothing new.  Ikaw buang!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/02/18/don%e2%80%99t-do-this-ppg%e2%80%99s-license-application-denied-and-it-went-ahead-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BIS Proposes New License Exception</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/01/12/bis-proposes-new-license-exception/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/01/12/bis-proposes-new-license-exception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle McClellan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export License]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BIS is proposing to add a new license exception which would allow exports, reexports and transfers of specific items to destinations of little risk without having to obtain a license. Now this doesn&#8217;t mean that the export is free and clear of any &#8220;time consuming&#8221; work for exporters, notification to BIS, destination control statements and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIS is proposing to add a new license exception which would allow exports, reexports and transfers of specific items to destinations of little risk without having to obtain a license. Now this doesn&#8217;t mean that the export is free and clear of any &#8220;time consuming&#8221; work for exporters, notification to BIS, destination control statements and consignee statements will be required for this exception.<span id="more-972"></span></p>
<p>This new license exception, STA (strategic trade authorization) is yet another child of the President&#8217;s Export Control Reform Initiative. As with any export control reforms/proposals there is not likely to be decision made any time in the near future.</p>
<p>Comments with regard to license exception STA must be received by BIS by February 7, 2011, for information on how to submit your comments visit: <a href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=ujsqs8bab&amp;t=ujhmnleab.0.bcu6nleab.ujsqs8bab.6778&amp;ts=S0571&amp;p=http%3A%2F%2Fedocket.access.gpo.gov%2F2010%2F2010-309689.htm" target="_blank">http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-309689.htm</a> (Federal Register)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/01/12/bis-proposes-new-license-exception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BIS&#8217; Kevin Wolfe Begins Free Weekly Teleconferences</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/01/12/bis-kevin-wolfe-begins-free-weekly-teleconferences/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/01/12/bis-kevin-wolfe-begins-free-weekly-teleconferences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle McClellan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DDTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense Trade Controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning December 22, 2010 Assistant Secretary for Export Administration, Kevin Wolfe, will be providing free teleconferences every Wednesday through February 2, 2011 from 2:00 pm &#8211; 4:00pm EST to discuss Commerce&#8217;s proposed rules related to the Administration&#8217;s effort to reform the export control system. The free conferences are limited to 100 people per session; to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beginning December 22, 2010 Assistant Secretary for Export Administration, Kevin Wolfe, will be providing free teleconferences every Wednesday through February 2, 2011 from 2:00 pm &#8211; 4:00pm EST to discuss Commerce&#8217;s proposed rules related to the Administration&#8217;s effort to reform the export control system.</p>
<p>The free conferences are limited to 100 people per session; to participate you must dial in at 866-917-2713; participant code: 4136642. You may also submit questions in advance of the training to be answered during the teleconference, submit your questions to <a href="mailto:oesdseminar@bis.doc.gov" target="_blank">oesdseminar@bis.doc.gov</a></p>
<p>Information available at: <a href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=ujsqs8bab&amp;t=ujhmnleab.0.acu6nleab.ujsqs8bab.6778&amp;ts=S0571&amp;p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bis.doc.gov%2Fnews%2F2010%2Fteleconference_opportunity_wolf.htm" target="_blank">http://www.bis.doc.gov/news/2010/teleconference_opportunity_wolf.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/01/12/bis-kevin-wolfe-begins-free-weekly-teleconferences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BIS Looking at Online SNAP-R Regsitration to Replace Paper SystemBIS Looking at Online SNAP-R Regsitration to Replace Paper System</title>
		<link>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/01/11/bis-looking-at-online-snap-r-regsitration-to-replace-paper-systembis-looking-at-online-snap-r-regsitration-to-replace-paper-system/</link>
		<comments>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/01/11/bis-looking-at-online-snap-r-regsitration-to-replace-paper-systembis-looking-at-online-snap-r-regsitration-to-replace-paper-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle McClellan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Export License]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/?p=960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BIS is currently considering an online registration process which would require users to obtain an account to submit licenses electronically through SNAP-R. Right now users must register to use SNAP-R by obtaining a pin via a paper or faxed form which takes a number of days/weeks to process. The new system would create &#8220;filing entities&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIS is currently considering an online registration process which would require users to obtain an account to submit licenses electronically through SNAP-R. Right now users must register to use SNAP-R by obtaining a pin via a paper or faxed form which takes a number of days/weeks to process. The new system would create &#8220;filing entities&#8221; which would be individuals/companies who can submit applications; &#8220;individual users&#8221; would be those who act of behalf of filing entities and &#8220;account administrators&#8221; would be at least one &#8220;filing entity&#8221; that would have the ability to add/remove individual users and other administrative options. This would greatly decrease the amount of time it takes to make these changes since the only way to make changes is via mail or fax at this time.</p>
<p>BIS wants to make this process entirely online, and is seeking comments by January 24, 2011.</p>
<p>Federal Register: <a href="http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?llr=ujsqs8bab&amp;t=ujhmnleab.0.4bu6nleab.ujsqs8bab.6778&amp;ts=S0571&amp;p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bis.doc.gov%2Fnews%2F2010%2Ffr_11232010.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.bis.doc.gov/news/2010/fr_11232010.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com/2011/01/11/bis-looking-at-online-snap-r-regsitration-to-replace-paper-systembis-looking-at-online-snap-r-regsitration-to-replace-paper-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: learnexportcompliance.bluekeyblogs.com @ 2012-02-05 05:41:23 -->
